Completed a Willow Garage internship

Soon after I posted my previous post (wow, that was almost five months ago?) I went on an internship at Willow Garage, to do research for my PhD thesis on motion planning.

No, I'm not going to make PR2s take over the world yet. So far, one of the things I had them do was solve a very simple puzzle, in simulation (and made a couple videos about it: this one, this one, and finally this one). For the other, well, check out the Willow Garage blog, you're bound to find my post there eventually.

The internship was massively useful. I learned a lot by being in an actual robotics research collective; I wish I had gone on such a trip sooner. And also, Silicon Valley is an awesome place to be, at least if you can afford it. A geek nexus, with robotic competitions, museum parties, "crash and compile" events (drinking games + coding; what's not to like?). And then there's the Friday meeting of the Brewers club, made from employees of Willow Garage. There's three things on the agenda: drink beer, drink more beer, oh and also brew beer to have what to drink in a few weeks. *proud* Yep, I brewed beer. It was awesome. Oh and speaking of brewing, there's the Homebrew Robotics club. Less about beer, more about hobby robots, also a great thing.

I started the internship with some ... I suppose negative ideas about the USA. I found out that I don't hate the place as much as I feared. Indeed, fellow interns were amazed as to why I didn't go there sooner, given my penchant for quoting random bits of pop culture trivia. And I met quite a few cool people at Willow Garage. So returning to Silicon Valley? Hm. I wouldn't dismiss it.

How about returning at Willow Garage? Because something changed, and was the talk of the robotics town. What does Willow Garage mean when it says it is changing? I'm not in a position to give details, suffice to say that Willow's focus on research is diminishing, to be replaced by a focus on doing marketable products. It's not yet clear to me whether that means I'd be interested in returning to the new company- it's a new Willow. Maybe I won't care much about what they want to sell. Who knows.

All in all great experience though. And oh wow, almost five months without a post. Hm. Time to rectify that.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dark Magics to avoid

If there's anything true of art in general, it's that any rule beginning with "don't" should be broken on occasion. Art should engage the soul, the conscious soul even, and nothing better for that than the occasional thing that's just that bit out of place, that bit unexpected. Conform to every rule you heard and what you produce can be consumed automatically. It's when the rules fail that consciousness kicks in. So in that spirit, treat the following "don'ts" as guidelines, and even break them-- but make sure you know what you're doing ;) For what follows is a list of magical powers which, if let loose on a plot, stand a good chance to render it hole-y. And the list is by no means exhaustive: feel free to argue for more items to be put on it. To give a flavor of the disruptive nature of magic, let's look at an example that will NOT kill a story ... but which, the character who suggested it argued, would kill society. NaN. Invis...
Read more

Review of "Mind over money"

Just watched a PBS Nova documentary called "Mind over money". It's a film about two competing models of economics, referred to in the show as 'rationalist economics' and 'behavioralist economics'. 'Rationalists' model each human being as being self interested and perfectly rational in pursuing the maximization of their own wealth; this results in certain mathematical assumptions that allow for an elegant theory. 'Behavioralists' claim that human beings do not act that way; even if maximization of personal wealth were pursued (which is not always the case), mistakes are often made. I for one believe that the behavioralists are right. It seems common sense to me to assume that nobody can reliably do the kind of mental calculation required by perfect economic rationality, and there are various cognitive biases to skew things the wrong way. But, I stress, this is merely a belief and I will defer to experts that study these things. In any case...
Read more

Parity Games: Intro

Image
With computer software becoming more important and complex, finding and solving bugs is more critical and difficult than ever. But why must this be? Surely computer programs, running as they do on deterministic machines powered by pure math, can be checked automatically. Well, in general, no. The space of programs, as a whole, is so wild that there exists no algorithm to answer even simple questions such as "will this get stuck in an endless loop". But, if we only need to look at restricted classes of programs, there are mathematical methods to guarantee correctness, or automatically construct a correct program -- where "correct" of course depends on our application. Formal verification is the home of such nifty mathematics and in this post we will be looking at a beautiful slice of it: parity games . Plus, parity games are the home of a tantalizing open question: are they solvable in polynomial time? We'll define what "parity gam...
Read more